Help & Rules

Everything you need to know to play the simulation

How the Simulation Works

You are part of a crisis management exercise. Each team plays a specific role in responding to a cascading crisis scenario set in Southwest Virginia.

Each Phase

  1. Check the dashboard for your team's role, budget, and trust level
  2. Review the active incidents visible to your role
  3. Coordinate with other teams if needed
  4. Submit your response report on Canvas
  5. The facilitator processes responses and updates the dashboard with new incidents and scores

Reading the Dashboard

Incident Severity

BadgeLevelMeaning
Critical5Immediate action required, lives at risk or major system failure
High4Urgent, significant impact if unaddressed
Medium3Important but not immediately dangerous
Low2Minor issue, can be addressed when time allows
Info1Informational, awareness item

Incident States

StateMeaning
PendingNo team has addressed this yet
In ProgressTeams are working on it
PartialPartially resolved — helped but not fully fixed
ResolvedFully resolved
EscalatedGot worse due to inaction — a follow-on incident has been opened; teams may still earn partial credit for pre-deadline effort

Dashboard Tips

Submitting Your Response

When ready, your team submits a Response Report on Canvas. Use this template:

# Response Report **Team:** [Your Team Name] **Role:** [Your Role] **Phase:** [#] ## Incidents Addressed [List incident titles from the dashboard] ## Situation Summary [1-2 sentences: What's the problem and why is your team responding?] ## Collaboration | Team | What We Did Together | |------|---------------------| | | | ## Actions Taken (from catalog) | Action ID | Action Name | Cost | Why | |-----------|-------------|------|-----| | | | $ | | ## Proposed Custom Actions | Proposed Action | Est. Cost | Expected Effect | Time Needed | Risks | |-----------------|-----------|-----------------|-------------|-------| | | $ | | | | **Justification:** [Why is this action reasonable for your team?] ## Transfers | From | To | Amount | Purpose | |------|-----|--------|---------| | | | $ | | ## Remaining Budget $[amount] ## Outcomes & Next Steps **What we expect to happen:** **What we still need:** **Risks we're watching:** ## Disputes & Feedback *Optional: Flag anything from the previous update cycle that seems unreasonable — e.g., how your actions were evaluated, scoring, trust changes, inject outcomes, or custom action rulings.* | What | Why You Disagree | |------|-----------------| | | |

Actions & Budget

Using Catalog Actions

The Action Catalog lists all pre-approved actions your team can take. Each action has:

Custom Actions

You can propose actions not in the catalog. The facilitator will evaluate feasibility, adjust costs, and determine outcomes. Custom actions can be:

Cost Splitting on Collaborative Actions

When multiple teams collaborate on the same catalog action targeting the same incident, they split the cost equally:

CollaborationCost per Team
2 teams50% each
3 teams33% each
4+ teamsEqual split

Requirements: Both teams must document the collaboration in their response reports for the split to apply.

No split applies when:

Budget Transfers

Teams can transfer budget to other teams to fund actions they can't take themselves. Both teams must document the transfer. The receiving team must still take the action — a transfer alone doesn't resolve anything.

Approval Chains

Action TypeRequires Approval From
National Guard requestGovernor's SW Virginia Liaison
Federal emergency declarationGovernor's SW Virginia Liaison + CISA Regional Coordinator
Hospital mutual aid activationCarilion Clinic System
Road closures / detoursVDOT SW Region
Environmental emergencyVA DEQ SW Regional Office + Governor's SW Virginia Liaison
Emergency broadcastGovernor's SW Virginia Liaison or SW Virginia EMA
Evacuation ordersSW Virginia EMA + Montgomery County Government
Telecom emergency reroutingShentel Communications

Trust System

Trust represents public confidence in your organization. It starts at the value shown on the dashboard and changes based on your actions.

Trust LevelEffect
80–100%Actions cost 20% less, community cooperation, faster approvals
50–70%Normal effectiveness
30–40%Actions cost 25% more, community resistance, media scrutiny
10–20%Actions may fail (25% chance), protests, delayed responses

What Changes Trust

Scoring

Teams earn points by resolving incidents. There are no penalty points — you earn for successes, not punished for failures.

Resolution Points

ResolutionPoints
Fully resolved100% of incident's point value
Strong partial (directly addressed, solved most of it)50%
Moderate partial (helped but didn't fix root cause)25–35%
Indirect contribution (side effect of another action)10–20%

Escalated Incidents — Mitigation Credit

When an initial incident escalates because the deadline passed, it is marked Escalated and is no longer eligible for full points. However, teams that completed their portion of the response before the deadline still earn partial credit:

Collaboration Split

When multiple teams collaborate to resolve an incident:

Bonus Points

MetricPoints
Vulnerable population protected (per 100 people)+25
Critical service restored (per major system)+150
Budget remaining (per $1M at end)+10
Trust maintained/gained (per point above start)+50
Successful cross-team coordination+75

Collaboration

Many incidents require multiple teams to resolve. Collaboration is rewarded:

Intelligence Sharing

Each phase's action catalog includes an Intelligence Sharing action available to ALL teams at no cost. Sharing information with other teams builds trust and improves collective response. Check your phase's action catalog for the specific action ID.

Tips for Success